http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52964
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52964
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-13
09:50:01 UTC ---
It's at least somewhat making -fsyntax-only less useful for C++ ... I'd use
-fsyntax-only to have all errors reported and thus all invalid CUs rejected ...
We do report non-syntax
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52964
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-12
23:25:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > With -fsyntax-only, the warning is not emitted -- any reason for that?
>
> Yes because -fsyntax-only does not do templat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52964
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-12
23:23:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> With -fsyntax-only, the warning is not emitted -- any reason for that?
Yes because -fsyntax-only does not do template instantatiations at all IIRC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52964
--- Comment #3 from davidxl 2012-04-12 23:19:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> And with trunk we print:
>
> pr52964.cc: In instantiation of ‘struct S1<4>’:
> pr52964.cc:2:49: required from ‘struct S2’
> pr52964.cc:3:45: required from ‘vo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52964
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52964
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-12
23:04:05 UTC ---
pinskia@server:~$ ~/treecombine-gcc/bin/gcc t.cc
t.cc: In instantiation of ‘struct S1<4>’:
t.cc:4:49: required from ‘struct S2’
t.cc:5:45: required from ‘void foo(T) [with T = int]
