[Bug c++/5305] wrong constructor called -- default argument in constructor not seen

2008-09-12 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-13 01:12 --- This has been fixed on mainline between 2008-06-26 and 2008-07-05. I think this was 'fallout' from 2008-07-02 Jason Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Make-lang.in (cp/typeck2.o): Add $(REAL_H) dependency.

[Bug c++/5305] wrong constructor called -- default argument in constructor not seen

2007-09-24 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Comment #8 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-09-24 18:57 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Actually, I've fixed several of those in the past few weeks. I think this very much appreciated fact was what caused Richard to CC: you on this PR :-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug c++/5305] wrong constructor called -- default argument in constructor not seen

2007-09-24 Thread jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #7 from jason at redhat dot com 2007-09-24 17:05 --- Subject: Re: wrong constructor called -- default argument in constructor not seen rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Looks like non-regression wrong-code bugs get no attention :/ Actually, I've fixed several of tho

[Bug c++/5305] wrong constructor called -- default argument in constructor not seen

2007-09-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-23 11:25 --- Reconfirmed. Looks like non-regression wrong-code bugs get no attention :/ -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -