[Bug c++/53605] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Compiler ICEs in size_binop_loc

2012-06-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53605 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53605] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Compiler ICEs in size_binop_loc

2012-06-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53605 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug c++/53605] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Compiler ICEs in size_binop_loc

2012-06-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53605 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/53605] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Compiler ICEs in size_binop_loc

2012-06-11 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53605 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-06-11 13:41:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > but I wonder about the inconsistency between the max == INTEGER_CST and > !INTEGER_CST case where we do _not_ add one to the expression to be mangled. Yep,