http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler
2012-06-10 21:11:41 UTC ---
This does not look like a compiler defect to me. Z::n has never been defined
but is odr-used.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler
2012-06-10 21:26:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > This is exactly:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition
>
> I agree. But let me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-10
21:37:38 UTC ---
I've updated the wiki with words to that effect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-10
21:50:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> because that was fixed with C++11 due to
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#712
>
> This situation should no longer requir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Krügler
2012-06-11 06:47:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > because that was fixed with C++11 due to
> >
> > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#712
> >
> > Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53627
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Krügler
2012-06-11 06:47:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > because that was fixed with C++11 due to
> >
> > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#712
> >
> > Th
