https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Oct 5 22:58:55 2016
New Revision: 240819
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240819&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/54293 - binding reference to member of temporary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||potswa at mac dot com
--- Comment #12 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
--- Comment #11 from Daniel Krügler
2012-08-21 08:07:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> > In other words: In this case IsValid(&ref_int) will hold for the same
> > reasons
> > as it holds for IsValid(&ref_obj).
>
> That is true, and I didn'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
--- Comment #10 from Jiří Paleček 2012-08-21 07:51:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > > I agree with your analysis, but would like to point out that there is
> > > change
> > > planned to essentially this part of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
--- Comment #9 from Daniel Krügler
2012-08-21 06:13:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > I agree with your analysis, but would like to point out that there is change
> > planned to essentially this part of the wording due to
> >
> > http://w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
--- Comment #8 from Jiří Paleček 2012-08-20 22:52:31
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > — If E2 is a non-static data member and the type of E1 is “cq1 vq1 X”, and
> > the
> > type of E2 is “cq2 vq2
> > T”, the expres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Krügler
2012-08-20 22:17:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> — If E2 is a non-static data member and the type of E1 is “cq1 vq1 X”, and the
> type of E2 is “cq2 vq2
> T”, the expression designates the named member of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
--- Comment #6 from Jiří Paleček 2012-08-20 21:56:39
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I think there is a compiler bug. The ruling text seems to be the
> first bullet of 8.5.3/5 and its first sub-bullet:
>
> - If the reference is an lvalue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
crowl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crowl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
Jiří Paleček changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpalecek at web dot de
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
--- Comment #3 from Ollie Wild 2012-08-17 14:18:59 UTC
---
No, this is a different failure. With my patch applied, the testcase still
fails exactly as described.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
Paul Pluzhnikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aaw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54293
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-08-16
23:02:07 UTC ---
I think this is a dup of bug 54197 or at least related to it.
14 matches
Mail list logo
