http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54825
--- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse 2012-10-05 14:32:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Forget my comment, apparently Richard found the bug before I could even read
the report... :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54825
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse 2012-10-05 14:29:07
UTC ---
Hmm, how should I compile the code?
I tried with g++ bug.cc -std=c++11 but that fails because of typeof (you want
decltype instead). With -std=gnu++11, I get an error that "the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54825
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-10-05
14:28:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 28364
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28364
patch
patch I am testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54825
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54825
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54825
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54825
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54825
--- Comment #2 from Ulrich Drepper 2012-10-05
13:59:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 28363
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28363
Reproducer
Why didn't BZ add the file?...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54825
--- Comment #1 from Ulrich Drepper 2012-10-05
13:58:21 UTC ---
In case the version number isn't making this clear, I tested this with the
current mainline code. 4.7 probably won't work at all since some of the
features used have been adde
