http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55250
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |accepts-invalid
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-11-09
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-09
12:51:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Now, reading http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2235.pdf
> , it is not entirely unambiguous which behavior is correct.
That paper is five years old, so not relevant to what C++11 allows.
The standard says:
The definition of a constexpr function shall satisfy the following constraints:
[...]
— its function-body shall be = delete, = default, or a compound-statement that
contains only
— null statements,
— static_assert-declarations
— typedef declarations and alias-declarations that do not define classes or
enumerations,
[...]
so it's ill-formed to declare an enumeration.
