http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 27 16:20:59 2014
New Revision: 208200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208200&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60353
PR c++/55877
* decl2.c (tentative_decl_linkage): D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 25 21:19:06 2014
New Revision: 208157
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208157&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/55877
* decl2.c (no_linkage_error): Handle C++98 semantics.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
No, the #c4 testcase is still a regression from 4.4, verified using latest
trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini ---
Can we close this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.7.4
--- Comment #7 from Jakub