[Bug c++/55881] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored ignored when inlining

2021-07-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e8db5f70f27b6de8139339ef1866eaa153c2bf67 commit r12-2092-ge8db5f70f27b6de8139339ef1866eaa153c2bf67 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Tue

[Bug c++/55881] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored ignored when inlining

2019-11-02 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2013-01-07 00:00:00 |2019-11-2 --- Comment #8 from Manu

[Bug c++/55881] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored ignored when inlining

2018-10-08 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Some comments from a discussion with Martin and David: %G and %K sometimes do not work with pragma diagnostics. The reason is that the pragma diagnostics check is done here: https://github.com/gcc-mi

[Bug c++/55881] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored ignored when inlining

2018-02-25 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com --- C

[Bug c++/55881] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored ignored when inlining

2013-01-08 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-01-08 11:14:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > Well - confirmed. Unlikely to be fixed. > > That's _very_ unfortunate. It makes the pragma almost useless in practi

[Bug c++/55881] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored ignored when inlining

2013-01-07 Thread greened at obbligato dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881 --- Comment #4 from David Greene 2013-01-07 21:50:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Well - confirmed. Unlikely to be fixed. That's _very_ unfortunate. It makes the pragma almost useless in practice.

[Bug c++/55881] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored ignored when inlining

2013-01-07 Thread greened at obbligato dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881 --- Comment #3 from David Greene 2013-01-07 21:49:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > What is the output of GCC? warning.cpp: In function 'int main(int, char**)': warning.cpp:5:19: warning: 'n' may be used uninitialized in this functi

[Bug c++/55881] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored ignored when inlining

2013-01-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|U

[Bug c++/55881] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored ignored when inlining

2013-01-05 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen