https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56991
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56991
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Aug 29 13:12:02 2014
New Revision: 214729
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214729root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-29 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56991
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Matheus Izvekov from comment #2)
I get also a similar bug:
#include initializer_list
//is accepted by gcc
constexpr std::initializer_listint good1 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56991
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56991
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|constexpr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56991
--- Comment #2 from Matheus Izvekov mizvekov at gmail dot com 2013-04-18
08:10:19 UTC ---
I get also a similar bug:
#include initializer_list
//is accepted by gcc
constexpr std::initializer_listint good1 = { 1, 2, 3 };
struct foo { int a, b;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56991
--- Comment #3 from Morwenn morwenn29 at hotmail dot fr 2013-04-18 08:12:44
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I don't see the compiler *crashing*, I see it *rejecting* the snippet.
Indeed, sorry for the poor formulation.
