https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57854
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57854
Nach changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nachms+gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57854
--- Comment #5 from Ville Voutilainen ---
It seems to me that
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=219213
implements the desired functionality. Can we close this bug?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57854
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57854
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #0)
> >
> > It should be in -Weffc++.
>
> Not unless a new C++11 edition of Effective C++ recommends using over
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57854
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #0)
>
> It should be in -Weffc++.
Not unless a new C++11 edition of Effective C++ recommends using override on
all overriding functions, and not unless we update -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57854
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
