[Bug c++/58091] Non-ambiguous member lookup rejected

2021-07-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58091 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- clang started to reject it in clang 9.

[Bug c++/58091] Non-ambiguous member lookup rejected

2013-08-30 Thread thomas.br...@virtuell-zuhause.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58091 Thomas Braun changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thomas.braun@virtuell-zuhau

[Bug c++/58091] Non-ambiguous member lookup rejected

2013-08-06 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58091 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- Generally speaking, this is a basic C++ issue, doesn't have to do with the recent constexpr, and normally icc is very solid about those. Remember there are also DRs, besides the published Standards. At the mom

[Bug c++/58091] Non-ambiguous member lookup rejected

2013-08-06 Thread fimbul77 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58091 --- Comment #2 from fimbul77 at gmail dot com --- 3.4 Name lookup The name lookup rules apply uniformly to all names (including typedef-names (7.1.3), namespace-names (7.3), and class-names (9.1)) wherever the grammar allows such names in the conte

[Bug c++/58091] Non-ambiguous member lookup rejected

2013-08-06 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58091 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- However current ICC agrees with GCC. We may have something in Bugzilla.