http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58525
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Ivchenko ---
Created attachment 30891
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30891&action=edit
Proposed untested fix
Proposed untested fix is attached
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58525
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
Please always send patches to the mailing list: attached to bugs are easily
overlooked or forgotten.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58525
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Ivchenko ---
thanks. I have sent it to gcc-paches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg00402.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58525
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Nov 23 16:28:42 2013
New Revision: 205310
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205310&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/58525
* call.c (build_operator_new_call): Add flag_exceptions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58525
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58525
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Ivchenko ---
(In reply to Volker Reichelt from comment #5)
> Alexander, Jason, can this bug be closed as fixed?
Yes, it is fixed now in trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58525
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58525
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
