http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60225
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60225
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Feb 18 23:11:26 2014
New Revision: 207858
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207858&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-02-18 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60225
* semantics
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60225
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Thus, it seems to me that to have a consistent literal_type_p /
ensure_literal_type_for_constexpr_object pair we should use strip_array_types
in the latter too. The below passes testing, for example:
Index: s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60225
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60225
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60225
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
