https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
Daniel Sommermann dcsommer at fb dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcsommer at fb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Sep 11 18:08:24 2014
New Revision: 215186
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215186root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-11 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
--- Comment #3 from Deniz Bahadir D.Bahadir at GMX dot de ---
Thanks for the comment.
So, at least we aggree that the cases for addr2 and addr6 should not warn (in
C++11) as it initializes all values. Possibly this holds true for addr9, too?
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Deniz Bahadir from comment #3)
Thanks for the comment.
So, at least we aggree that the cases for addr2 and addr6 should not warn
(in C++11) as it initializes all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
--- Comment #5 from Deniz Bahadir D.Bahadir at GMX dot de ---
Thanks again.
Then I need to appologize for misunderstanding the meaning of the warning-flag.
Because of several internet-sources, like the one I cited, I always thought
that the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
--- Comment #1 from Deniz Bahadir D.Bahadir at GMX dot de ---
This does not only occur with GCC 4.9.0 but also with older ones like 4.7 and
4.8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Deniz Bahadir from comment #0)
When compiling the following code (in C++11 mode) with
-Wmissing-field-initializers then almost all attempts to initialize
sockaddr_in
11 matches
Mail list logo