https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61723
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vanyacpp at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61723
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61723
--- Comment #8 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
Filed PR61833
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61723
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Paul Pluzhnikov from comment #6)
> This appears to be a different ICE.
> Should I reduce it?
Please. And open a new PR for it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61723
--- Comment #6 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
It turns out that the original unreduced test case does not error on trunk
@r212277;
it only ICEs on gcc-4.8 and gcc-4.9 branches.
But once I creduced it using 4.9, the reduced test also ICEd on trunk.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61723
--- Comment #5 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #1)
> I find this testcase rather weird
It's the result of creduce over a preprocessed original.
> std::initializer_list isn't a random user type
In the non-reduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61723
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61723
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jul 15 19:16:29 2014
New Revision: 212574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212574&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/60848
PR c++/61723
* call.c (is_std_init_list): Don't c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61723
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61723
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
10 matches
Mail list logo
