https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63657
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Nov 22 02:21:35 2014
New Revision: 217957
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217957root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/63657
PR c++/38958
* call.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63657
petschy at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63657
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63657
--- Comment #4 from petschy at gmail dot com ---
Sorry, but this is definitely not the same issue. Bug 38958 is about returning
by value and binding to a reference. This issue is about returning a REFERENCE
and binding it to a reference. No class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63657
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63657
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.2 |4.9.3
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63657
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
