https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spartan_117 at juno dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9499fe0403e310f4eb1f23279bff84259e120e76
commit r9-9453-g9499fe0403e310f4eb1f23279bff84259e120e76
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.0|10.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4fb1ee669ccaad16795baf25d2cab48d8cf8c1eb
commit r10-9136-g4fb1ee669ccaad16795baf25d2cab48d8cf8c1eb
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill ---
The fix looks safe to backport; it isn't a regression, but the number of
duplicate reports argue for making an exception.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leonid at volnitsky dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janezz55 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||max.kan...@nu-cost.com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c58f5cadfac338a67723fd6e41c9097760c4a33
commit r11-2420-g2c58f5cadfac338a67723fd6e41c9097760c4a33
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||okannen at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me at adhokshajmishraonline
dot in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Slightly different testcase from PR 69620 which is probably the same issue:
struct function {
template
function(F);
};
template
auto sum(T1 x, T2 y)
{
return x + y;
}
template
auto sum(T1 x,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wuyongwei at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at dcousens dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> Slightly reduced (it doesn't matter if g has a deduced return type):
Oops, it already wasn't deduced ... I confused myself with a new testcase I was
trying!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-12-21 00:00:00 |2017-6-28
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It is confirmed, and has been since 2014-12-08. If you look at the dropdown
you'll see there is no CONFIRMED status in GCC's bugzilla.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
--- Comment #2 from lcid-fire at gmx dot net ---
Shouldn't the status be confirmed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lcid-fire at gmx dot net
--- Comment
22 matches
Mail list logo
