[Bug c++/65923] False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

2021-12-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mferoldif at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug c++/65923] False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

2018-04-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c++/65923] False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

2018-04-20 Thread TonyELewis at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923 --- Comment #9 from Tony E Lewis --- I'm so delighted to see: #include #include using std::literals::chrono_literals::operator""s; using std::literals::string_literals::operator""s; ...compiling cleaning on Godbolt. Thanks for this

[Bug c++/65923] False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

2018-04-04 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65923] False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

2018-04-04 Thread ville at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923 --- Comment #7 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Wed Apr 4 16:05:11 2018 New Revision: 259087 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259087&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65923 gcc/cp PR c++/65923 * decl.c (grokfndecl): Handle

[Bug c++/65923] False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

2018-04-03 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/65923] False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

2018-04-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Richard Geary from comment #2) > This is still present in g++ 5.3.0, and also affects > std::literals::string_literals. The flag -Wno-literal-suffix does not turn > it off. It does for GCC 7+,

[Bug c++/65923] False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

2018-04-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eric at efcs dot ca --- Comment #4 fro

[Bug c++/65923] False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

2018-03-31 Thread arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923 Arthur O'Dwyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug c++/65923] False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

2016-03-31 Thread richardg.work at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923 Richard Geary changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richardg.work at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/65923] False positive for warning about literal operator suffix and using

2015-04-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65923 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIR