[Bug c++/66216] [6 Regression] Defaulted Operators and constructors not working with aligned attribute

2015-06-26 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66216 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 26 21:41:34 2015 New Revision: 225088 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225088&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66216 * class.c (finish_struct): Call fixup_attribu

[Bug c++/66216] [6 Regression] Defaulted Operators and constructors not working with aligned attribute

2015-06-26 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66216 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/66216] [6 Regression] Defaulted Operators and constructors not working with aligned attribute

2015-06-26 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66216 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jun 26 21:31:13 2015 New Revision: 225087 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225087&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66216 * class.c (finish_struct): Call fixup_attribu

[Bug c++/66216] [6 Regression] Defaulted Operators and constructors not working with aligned attribute

2015-05-20 Thread jamrial at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66216 --- Comment #2 from James Almer --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > And now it gives an ICE on trunk, so it's regressed from rejects-valid to > ice-on-valid-code: > > a.cc:1:7: internal compiler error: canonical types differ for

[Bug c++/66216] [6 Regression] Defaulted Operators and constructors not working with aligned attribute

2015-05-20 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66216 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, |