https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #16)
> I'd guess it was fixed by the patch for PR 86678.
Confirmed, it was fixed by r264171 for PR 86678.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'd guess it was fixed by the patch for PR 86678.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
fiesh at zefix dot tv changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fiesh at zefix dot tv
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
Benjamin Buch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benni.buch at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
Иван Молодецких changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yalterz at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
Matthijs van Duin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthijsvanduin at gmail dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
--- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #11)
> (In reply to rhalbersma from comment #10)
> > Ping to get this merged into the upcoming 5.4 release.
>
> Only regressions should be backported. Thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to rhalbersma from comment #10)
> Ping to get this merged into the upcoming 5.4 release.
Only regressions should be backported. This isn't one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
--- Comment #10 from rhalbersma ---
Ping to get this merged into the upcoming 5.4 release.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Sat Aug 29 18:51:26 2015
New Revision: 227323
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227323&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix c++/67371 (issues with throw in constexpr)
As PR67371 shows
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
--- Comment #7 from Casey Carter ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #6)
> Well, my patch survives regression testing and fixes the issue.
>
> But unfortunately it leads to accept invalid cases like:
>
> constexpr int f1() {
> t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Well, my patch survives regression testing and fixes the issue.
But unfortunately it leads to accept invalid cases like:
constexpr int f1() {
throw;
return 0;
}
or
constexpr void f2() {
throw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
The fix might be as simple as:
diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
index 1eacb8be9a44..7016b347a79c 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
@@ -4324,7 +4324,6 @@ poten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rhalbersma at gmail dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
--- Comment #1 from Louis Dionne ---
This is almost certainly a duplicate of #66026, yet it is still unconfirmed.
18 matches
Mail list logo
