https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67602
--- Comment #3 from Brad Huntting ---
Oops. I missed that part. Thanks.
brad
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:56 PM, miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67602
>
> --- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67602
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67602
--- Comment #2 from Mikhail Maltsev ---
(In reply to Brad Huntting from comment #0)
> It should be noted that the C standard appears to allow for undefined
> behavior when E2>=N.
And so does the C++ standard:
"... The behavior is undefined if
