[Bug c++/68138] "operator== is ambiguous" when comparing a tuple containing values with one containing refs

2022-01-07 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68138 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/68138] "operator== is ambiguous" when comparing a tuple containing values with one containing refs

2021-08-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68138 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- The original testcase and the one in comment #2 started to work in GCC 11+.

[Bug c++/68138] "operator== is ambiguous" when comparing a tuple containing values with one containing refs

2019-03-13 Thread harald at gigawatt dot nl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68138 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment

[Bug c++/68138] "operator== is ambiguous" when comparing a tuple containing values with one containing refs

2019-03-13 Thread unsavoryemail at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68138 Alexander Haase changed: What|Removed |Added CC||unsavoryemail at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/68138] "operator== is ambiguous" when comparing a tuple containing values with one containing refs

2015-11-11 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68138 --- Comment #1 from Ville Voutilainen --- The test works if operator== is not a member. There's something fairly fishy going on here.

[Bug c++/68138] "operator== is ambiguous" when comparing a tuple containing values with one containing refs

2015-11-11 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68138 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|