https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68295
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68295
--- Comment #6 from Peifeng Liu ---
Just a clue: when processing float/double consts/variables in the source code
files, this issue is very likely to be reproduced.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68295
Peifeng Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liupeifeng at live dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68295
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Maier-Komor ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Works for me on x86_64-linux.
Yes - it seems to be cygwin specific...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68295
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-cygwin
Host|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68295
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Maier-Komor ---
Created attachment 36701
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36701&action=edit
Another preprocessed testcase
This testcase has no missing symbols and should compile cleanly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68295
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Maier-Komor ---
The bug is reproduceable with gcc 5.2.0 on cygwin.
