[Bug c++/69277] [6 Regression] ICE mangling a flexible array member

2016-02-05 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69277 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69277] [6 Regression] ICE mangling a flexible array member

2016-02-03 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69277 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- Fixed.

[Bug c++/69277] [6 Regression] ICE mangling a flexible array member

2016-02-03 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69277 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Fixed.

[Bug c++/69277] [6 Regression] ICE mangling a flexible array member

2016-02-03 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69277 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Feb 4 04:50:42 2016 New Revision: 233126 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233126&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/69251 - [6 Regression] ICE in unify_array_domain on a flexible arra

[Bug c++/69277] [6 Regression] ICE mangling a flexible array member

2016-02-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69277 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- In response to another patch for a related problem Jason asked me to change the representation of flexible array members in C++. The alternate representation has an impact on how this bug is dealt with so it'

[Bug c++/69277] [6 Regression] ICE mangling a flexible array member

2016-02-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69277 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/69277] [6 Regression] ICE mangling a flexible array member

2016-01-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69277 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/69277] [6 Regression] ICE mangling a flexible array member

2016-01-14 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69277 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg00993.html