subject:"\[Bug c\+\+\/69517\] \[5\/6 regression\] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements"

[Bug c++/69517] [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

2016-04-14 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5 regression] SEGV on a|[5/6 regression] SEGV on a

[Bug c++/69517] [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

2016-04-13 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Apr 13 23:26:41 2016 New Revision: 234966 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234966&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/69517 - [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elem

[Bug c++/69517] [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

2016-03-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00441.html

[Bug c++/69517] [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

2016-03-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/69517] [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

2016-02-26 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c++/69517] [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

2016-01-29 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69517] [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

2016-01-28 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- By the way, it was removed in r219359.

[Bug c++/69517] [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

2016-01-28 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3) > Just to clarify: it's the program that crashes, not GCC (so removing the > ice-on-invalid-code keyword). > > But I also think that rejecting or at least loudly di

[Bug c++/69517] [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

2016-01-28 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code | --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Ju