https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2793af17db239429ea3a2e26834e74daa6cff2c0
commit r12-6285-g2793af17db239429ea3a2e26834e74daa6cff2c0
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 102267 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||55004
--- Comment #10 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johelegp at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ldalessandro at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There's no need to determine the addresses, only the truth of the inequality.
The standard says distinct functions have distinct addresses. Yes, linker
trickery can break that, but it's reasonable to rely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I don't think "(int)( != )" is a valid constant integer expression
> in either C or C++. (definitely not in C). This is why GCC rejects it.
Oops, good point.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't think "(int)( != )" is a valid constant integer expression in
either C or C++. (definitely not in C). This is why GCC rejects it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka ---
(Sorry about the typos in the original comment. To fix them,
s/since both foo and bar/since both foo and bar are/
s/when comparing and pointers/when comparing pointers/
s/the subsequent declarations/then
14 matches
Mail list logo
