https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect this is a dup of another bug too where the ABI for constraints just
was defined ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Is there an updated preprocessed source somewhere as I get a lot of:
expression must be enclosed in parentheses
For the concepts.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 47038
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47038&action=edit
New testcase
I tried updating the attachment to C++2a syntax and it crashes differently:
g++ -std=gnu++20 70
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
So, is this fixed as duplicate of PR69515?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037
Tom Honermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at honermann dot net
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70037
--- Comment #1 from Ville Voutilainen ---
The trace:
error: Two symbols with same comdat_group are not linked by the
same_comdat_group list.
"tuple<> is eligible for EBO" );
^
_ZNSt5
