https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70196
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70196
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #4)
> ordering comparison of pointers is only well-defined when the two pointers
> point into the same object (including one-past-the-end). [expr.ref]/4
>
Right,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70196
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
ordering comparison of pointers is only well-defined when the two pointers
point into the same object (including one-past-the-end). [expr.ref]/4
No object can have a NULL address.
The third bullet permits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70196
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70196
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70196
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Known to fail|
