https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70507
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70507
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jun 8 19:03:17 2016
New Revision: 237238
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237238&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70507
PR c/68120
* builtins.def (BUILT_IN_A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70507
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg00013.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70507
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70507
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Thank you for the suggestion.
Storing values via pointers is not C++ 14 specific so the answer to your
question is that having the builtins be treated as constexpr would be useful in
both C++ 11 and C++ 14 mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70507
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70507
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to fail|
