https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
When comparing r224581 (the first cc1plus that doesn't ICE on the gcc5
preprocessed source) with r244763 cc1plus on the same source (though, both are
checking builds), the latter eats less memory, not more.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
GCC 6.2 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog,
|
