https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Pádraig Brady from comment #15)
> So it would be good to set the "Target Milestone" to 5.5
But it was also fixed for 4.9.4, so that's what the target milestone says.
You can't reliably use t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
--- Comment #15 from Pádraig Brady ---
Actually it is backported to 5.
So it would be good to set the "Target Milestone" to 5.5
so this is obvious from this bug and from the list of bugs fixed in 5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Pádraig Brady from comment #13)
> It would be good to have this backported to the 5 branch.
What do you mean? I applied the bug fix to the 5 branch back in July (comment
#7), and the testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||P at draigBrady dot com
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The 4.9 branch is closed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
--- Comment #11 from Renlin Li ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #10)
> I've noticed that something similar to what Renlin suggested was committed
> to trunk as r238728.
>
> Could this testcase fix be backported to the release branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.5 |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 22 03:51:07 2016
New Revision: 238628
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238628&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71913 - missing copy elision with new.
* call.c (u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 22 03:46:41 2016
New Revision: 238625
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238625&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71913 - missing copy elision with new.
* call.c (u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 22 03:45:37 2016
New Revision: 238621
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238621&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71913 - missing copy elision with new.
* call.c (u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 22 03:41:44 2016
New Revision: 238619
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238619&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71913 - missing copy elision with new.
* call.c (u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
17 matches
Mail list logo
