https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78104
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78104
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78104
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzilla@poradnik-webmaster
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78104
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78104
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hiraditya at msn dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78104
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #0)
> > A simple example:
> >
> > int main() {
> > int *ob = new int();
> > delete ob;
> > }
> >
> > clang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78104
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #0)
> A simple example:
>
> int main() {
> int *ob = new int();
> delete ob;
> }
>
> clang optimizes it away:
Which is funny considering what Chris
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78104
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
PR 23383 for one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78104
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
There might be a few duplicates of this bug already.
