https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-01-26 00:00:00 |2021-12-08
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to night_ghost from comment #9)
> Seems that I missed a bugfix patch. Where I can download fixed GCC 5.4 to
> test?
Note that oldest supported branch is GCC 7, please try a new release:
https://www
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
--- Comment #9 from night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru ---
Seems that I missed a bugfix patch. Where I can download fixed GCC 5.4 to test?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
--- Comment #7 from night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru ---
Created attachment 40779
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40779&action=edit
testcase
ii and console log. If I change from -Os to any other mode then it compiles OK
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Wed Feb 15 09:27:57 2017
New Revision: 245476
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245476&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/79241: S/390: define TARGET_CUSTOM_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS.
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
--- Comment #5 from night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru ---
I'll try to exclude maximum of unneeded code from testcase and then upload it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Did you actually read it? You haven't provided any of this information:
the system type;
the options given when GCC was configured/built;
the complete command line that triggers the bug;
th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
--- Comment #2 from night_ghost at ykoctpa dot ru ---
90mbytes of code? you must be joking! But when I try to do a testcase with only
few files then all compiles OK. Moreover the classes which uses
FUNCTOR_BIND_MEMBER without additional "using na
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79241
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
14 matches
Mail list logo
