https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Sep 13 17:19:29 2017
New Revision: 252528
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252528&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-22 Yvan Roux
PR c++/80287
* g++.dg/pr80287.C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287
--- Comment #11 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Thu Aug 24 13:20:22 2017
New Revision: 251331
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251331&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80287 C++ crash with __attribute((may_alias))
gcc/
2017-08-24 Yvan R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287
--- Comment #10 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Tue Aug 22 10:51:52 2017
New Revision: 251273
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251273&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-22 Yvan Roux
Backport from mainline
2017-08-22 Y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287
--- Comment #9 from Yvan Roux ---
Author: yroux
Date: Tue Aug 22 09:32:38 2017
New Revision: 251268
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251268&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-22 Yvan Roux
PR c++/80287
* g++.dg/pr80287.C: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287
--- Comment #8 from Yvan Roux ---
OK, I'll submit a patch to add this second testcase on trunk and then only
include it in the backport on GCC 6.
Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Hmm, yes, maybe having a second test case without C++17 would be fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287
--- Comment #6 from Yvan Roux ---
Hi,
I got a small issue when testing the backport into the branch:
g++.dg/lto/pr80287_0.C is not a suitable testcase for GCC 6 branch, since it
uses c++17 class std:any which is not available in GCC 6. In the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Yvan Roux from comment #4)
> Hi Bernd,
>
> gcc-6-branch is impacted by this issue (observed on AArch64 target at
> r250109, with regression introduced at r234768). I can prepare the backport
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287
Yvan Roux changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yroux at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger ---
fixed on trunk.
It's theoretically possible that gcc-6-branch is also affected,
but I have not tried.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Mon Apr 17 20:41:40 2017
New Revision: 246955
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246955&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
017-04-17 Bernd Edlinger
PR c++/80287
* class.c (f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80287
--- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger ---
good news is, I already have a patch:
Index: gcc/cp/class.c
===
--- gcc/cp/class.c (revision 246605)
+++ gcc/cp/class.c (working cop
13 matches
Mail list logo