https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Isn't this dup of PR84502 and thus fixed with r257892?
Very probably, let me test it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #6)
> We'll need to bisect on the .o level. I see no -Wabi=11 warnings though.
It's here to be seen: https://pastebin.com/bZFRJycS
As mentioned visible only with -O0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
--- Comment #6 from Mare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Good, building the problem with -O0, I see very many -Wabi warnings:
https://pastebin.com/bZFRJycS
That can probably explain why it fails, right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43394
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43394&action=edit
Build log file
Adding explicitly both flags and it still fails. I'm adding build log.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Also I think -Wabi=11 could help with reducing this beast.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Are all the object files recompiled with GCC 8 (-fabi-version=12)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84286
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Version
11 matches
Mail list logo
