subject:"\[Bug c\+\+\/86216\] g\+\+ ICE on valid code\: verify

[Bug c++/86216] g++ ICE on valid code: verify_ssa failed

2021-10-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org --- Comment #12

[Bug c++/86216] g++ ICE on valid code: verify_ssa failed

2020-05-08 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/86216] g++ ICE on valid code: verify_ssa failed

2020-01-31 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86216] g++ ICE on valid code: verify_ssa failed

2020-01-31 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00a49cd840f60774b0e9e0109fb10559bc9a9194 commit r10-6389-g00a49cd840f60774b0e9e0109fb10559bc9a9194 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/86216] g++ ICE on valid code: verify_ssa failed

2018-07-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- The C FE does /* Arrange for the SAVE_EXPR on the inside of the MINUS_EXPR, which allows the -1 to get folded with the +1 that happens when

[Bug c++/86216] g++ ICE on valid code: verify_ssa failed

2018-07-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- I can't fully reproduce the obfuscation of the C++ FE (the +-1) but the following is close but it also works: typedef int intptr_t; void foo (intptr_t n, unsigned a) { typedef intptr_t ArrTy[(long)a+1];

[Bug c++/86216] g++ ICE on valid code: verify_ssa failed

2018-07-13 Thread rguenther at suse dot de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216 > > --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- > I guess lambdas really need to have all the

[Bug c++/86216] g++ ICE on valid code: verify_ssa failed

2018-07-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86216 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- I guess lambdas really need to have all the needed parameters captured, and for VLAs that likely includes not just the VLAs themselves, but their sizes as well. That is something that needs to be done in the