)
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/86306] Initializing atomic qualified type with another atomic
qualified type leads to assertion failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86306
--- Comment #9 from zhonghao at pku dot org.cn ---
(In reply to zhonghao from comment #8)
&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86306
--- Comment #9 from zhonghao at pku dot org.cn ---
(In reply to zhonghao from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> > > Because you are just blindly copying things from one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86306
--- Comment #8 from zhonghao at pku dot org.cn ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> > Because you are just blindly copying things from one bugzilla to the other,
> > without making
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86306
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> Because you are just blindly copying things from one bugzilla to the other,
> without making any effort to check if what you are reporting is sensible.
For
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86306
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to zhonghao from comment #5)
> Another bug report (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21835) also used
> the code. In particular, David Majnemer said that the following code,
>
> typedef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86306
--- Comment #5 from zhonghao at pku dot org.cn ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> _Atomic is a C keyword, it is not part of C++.
>
> Clang++ accepts it as a non-standard extension. GCC ddoes not accept it,
> because it's not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86306
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
_Atomic is a C keyword, it is not part of C++.
Clang++ accepts it as a non-standard extension. GCC ddoes not accept it,
because it's not part of C++.
If you don't understand what this means, stop filing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86306
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86306
--- Comment #2 from zhonghao at pku dot org.cn ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> It's correctly rejected by GCC because _Atomic is a C keyword, not a C++ one.
>
> Please try to understand the code before filing bugs, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86306
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
10 matches
Mail list logo
