https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86329
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86329
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86329
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.4
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86329
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Feb 14 23:02:45 2019
New Revision: 268909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268909=gcc=rev
Log:
C++: don't offer bogus "._0" suggestions (PR c++/86329)
PR c++/86329 reports
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86329
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> Fixed on trunk by r262199; still affects gcc-8 and gcc-7 branches.
so what should be the target milestone then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86329
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Fixed on trunk by r262199; still affects gcc-8 and gcc-7 branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86329
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Jun 27 23:21:46 2018
New Revision: 262199
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262199=gcc=rev
Log:
C++: don't offer bogus "._0" suggestions (PR c++/86329)
PR c++/86329 reports
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86329
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg01694.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86329
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed on trunk, gcc-8, and gcc-7.
Doesn't affect gcc-6.
The bogus dotted names are coming from anonymous enums in the header; a more
minimal reproducer is:
enum {};
int test()
{
return __0;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86329
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
10 matches
Mail list logo
