https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #12)
> This still starts to produces spurious warnings for diamond inheritance:
Fixed, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c6567b4090d9363f90b5c68e238e7d0964b6e89
commit r13-1824-g4c6567b4090d9363f90b5c68e238e7d0964b6e89
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
--- Comment #12 from Stephan Bergmann ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #11)
> The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81bec060e31b6ef2feeb3046c6f13a207c6f698a
>
> commit r13-1559-g81bec060e31b6ef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81bec060e31b6ef2feeb3046c6f13a207c6f698a
commit r13-1559-g81bec060e31b6ef2feeb3046c6f13a207c6f698a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sbergman at redhat dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:113844d68e94f4e9c0e946db351ba7d3d4a1335a
commit r13-1262-g113844d68e94f4e9c0e946db351ba7d3d4a1335a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
David Blaikie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dblaikie at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
--- Comment #5 from xantares09 at hotmail dot com ---
still there with 10.1, see attached patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
xantares09 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xantares09 at hotmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
Here you are:
[code]
class Foo
{
public:
virtual void f(int);
};
class Bar : public Foo
{
public:
virtual void f(short);
};
[/code]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87729
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Daniel Fruzynski from comment #0)
> clang includes -Woverloaded-virtual in -Wall. Please do same for gcc.
I was looking for a testcase to check and tried g++.dg/warn/pr61945.C but clang
doesn't
15 matches
Mail list logo
