https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89029
--- Comment #4 from Peter Dimov ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> c.f. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2018-03/msg00031.html and the replies
Yes, pretty much.
> I doubt we would catch many bugs that way, as most bugs would in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89029
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Peter Dimov from comment #0)
> (This is simplified from an attempt to create a statically-diagnosed assert
> facility that would warn when the asserted expression is known to be false:
> https:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89029
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89029
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
