https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89990
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||88058
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89990
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89990
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89990
Bug 89990 depends on bug 88058, which changed state.
Bug 88058 Summary: gcc fails to detect use of out of scope variable ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88058
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89990
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89990
--- Comment #7 from Andrew D'Addesio ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> The warning is now included in GCC 12.
> And this makes this a dup of bug 63272.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 63272 ***
Yep, the ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89990
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew D'Addesio from comment #7)
>
> This actually has gotten me curious. Would you have an idea/explanation
> behind that 2 function call threshold @Andrew Pinski?
Most likely it is due to ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89990
Andrew D'Addesio changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||modchipv12 at gmail dot com
--- Comme
