[Bug c++/92193] Poor diagnostics when a constexpr function call follows a failed static_assert

2021-08-31 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92193 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/92193] Poor diagnostics when a constexpr function call follows a failed static_assert

2021-08-31 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92193 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9aeadd8c319d5d940fa4dc91a393fc2959d27719 commit r12-3258-g9aeadd8c319d5d940fa4dc91a393fc2959d27719 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Mo

[Bug c++/92193] Poor diagnostics when a constexpr function call follows a failed static_assert

2021-08-27 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92193 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/92193] Poor diagnostics when a constexpr function call follows a failed static_assert

2021-08-26 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92193 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- This makes the diagnostics for std::vector diabolical. We hit a nice static assertion saying something like: /home/jwakely/gcc/12/include/c++/12.0.0/bits/stl_uninitialized.h:90:56: error: static assertion

[Bug c++/92193] Poor diagnostics when a constexpr function call follows a failed static_assert

2019-11-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92193 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|