https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93106
Yunrui Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93106
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93106
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev at gutoehrlein dot eu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93106
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93106
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93106
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Confirmed. check_return_expr can't use convert_for_initialization to test
whether to treat the returned lvalue as an rvalue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93106
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93106
--- Comment #2 from Yunrui Wang ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> What you cite doesn't say anything that would make the testcase invalid.
> The standard says that for an implicitly movable entity seen in return
> statement shall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93106
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
