[Bug c++/94594] New: struct containing an aligned obj with stronger alignment, change the alignment accordingly instead of throwing an error, inconsistent with the C++ standard

[sinbal2l at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94594

            Bug ID: 94594
           Summary: struct containing an aligned obj with stronger
                    alignment, change the alignment accordingly instead of
                    throwing an error, inconsistent with the C++ standard
           Product: gcc
           Version: 10.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: sinbal2l at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

This example actually coming straight from the standard.

>From the standard (with the first example being part of the quote): 
[dcl.align]p5

"The combined effect of all alignment-specifiers in a declaration shall not
specify an alignment that is less strict
then the alignment that would be required for the entity being declared if all
alignment-specifiers appertaining
to that entity were omitted. 

[Example:
  struct alignas(8) S {}; 
  struct alignas(1) U {          
  S s;
  }; // error: U specifies an alignment that is less strict than if the 
  alignas(1) were omitted.  (*)
— end example] "

(*) //// (My) Meta comment: If I'm not mistaken, this should be alignas(8) 

But on the latest revision, this compiles, aligning my_u to 8.

typedef struct alignas(8) S{};
typedef struct alignas(1) {         // This decleration should not be allowed
    S i;
}U; 

int main() {
    U my_u;    

    cout << "alignof (decltype(my_u))" << alignof (decltype(my_u)) << endl;
}

https://godbolt.org/z/KvMo4A

Attaching the related (but not same, IMO) bug: 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94569

(Hopefully, I quoted the right part this time...)

P.S. Thank you very much for doing such a great job! (No. 2)