https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94775
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94775
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94775
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6318fe77395fc0dd59419bc4d69cd06ac0158e54
commit r10-8071-g6318fe77395fc0dd59419bc4d69cd06ac0158e54
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94775
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94775
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
So a fix could be this, but maybe it would make us create a lot more variants
(?):
--- a/gcc/tree.c
+++ b/gcc/tree.c
@@ -6493,7 +6493,8 @@ check_base_type (const_tree cand, const_tree base)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94775
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
The TYPE_USER_ALIGN (t) assert was there even before my change, but I agree
this is a latent problem not directly caused by r8-4668-g8a5ee94a082b3d48.
Here strip_typedefs gets "const d[0]" with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94775
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
