[Bug c++/94867] [9 Regression] New (since gcc 8) false positive with -Wnull-dereference in very simple code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94867 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka --- I see this warning with GCC 10.2 and with trunk when using the flags -O -std=c++14 -Wnull-dereference as well. Should this be marked as a 9/10/11 regression then?

[Bug c++/94867] [9 Regression] New (since gcc 8) false positive with -Wnull-dereference in very simple code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94867 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug c++/94867] [9 Regression] New (since gcc 8) false positive with -Wnull-dereference in very simple code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94867 --- Comment #4 from Vadim Zeitlin --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > It's gone since r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797d6. This commit is included in releases/gcc-10.1.0 tag, but I still see the warning with the provided example when using g

[Bug c++/94867] [9 Regression] New (since gcc 8) false positive with -Wnull-dereference in very simple code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94867 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug c++/94867] [9 Regression] New (since gcc 8) false positive with -Wnull-dereference in very simple code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94867 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/94867] [9 Regression] New (since gcc 8) false positive with -Wnull-dereference in very simple code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94867 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-04-30 Known to fail|