[Bug c++/95305] Same code takes ~1/4 to 1/7th the time to compile under clang++.

2020-05-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95305 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #7 from Jonathan

[Bug c++/95305] Same code takes ~1/4 to 1/7th the time to compile under clang++.

2020-05-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95305 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 48621 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48621=edit preprocessed source Compile with -std=gnu++17

[Bug c++/95305] Same code takes ~1/4 to 1/7th the time to compile under clang++.

2020-05-26 Thread gcc-bugs at hussar dot me.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95305 --- Comment #5 from Jason --- (In reply to Jason from comment #4) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > > Can you attach a "representativ" (maybe the worst?) compilation unit in > > preprocessed form? > > Compressed, the preprocessed

[Bug c++/95305] Same code takes ~1/4 to 1/7th the time to compile under clang++.

2020-05-26 Thread gcc-bugs at hussar dot me.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95305 --- Comment #4 from Jason --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Can you attach a "representativ" (maybe the worst?) compilation unit in > preprocessed form? Compressed, the preprocessed translation unit in question is just too

[Bug c++/95305] Same code takes ~1/4 to 1/7th the time to compile under clang++.

2020-05-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95305 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog Last reconfirmed|