https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e4c9ebbab7bec3b5994f85aebce13bf37cf46e9
commit r10-8471-g5e4c9ebbab7bec3b5994f85aebce13bf37cf46e9
Author: Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063
--- Comment #17 from Ian McInerney ---
I think that r11-1899 is the more important one to backport, since that will
also allow for warnings that are generated by headers inside "-isystem" include
directories to not have the notes printed without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
One or both of r11-1853 and r11-1899 should be backported.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063
--- Comment #15 from Ian McInerney ---
Martin, can you backport you compiler patch to the GCC10 branch so it is fixed
there as well? As I said, this makes the warning essentially useless to use on
large codebases with the current release.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063
--- Comment #14 from Ian McInerney ---
Is it possible to backport this to the GCC 10 branch? The printing of these
notes makes this warning almost impossible to use on any large project that
uses the standard library.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063
--- Comment #13 from Martin Sebor ---
Jon, is there anything else to do here or can we resolve this as fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f9c9ea40a1e937ea1b549625cf7762d4a8a2078
commit r11-1899-g6f9c9ea40a1e937ea1b549625cf7762d4a8a2078
Author: Martin Sebor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
What's wrong with checking the return value of warning_at as in the patch in
comment 8?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 48838
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48838=edit
Fix orphaned notes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96063
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Component|libstdc++
12 matches
Mail list logo
