https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96077
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
Fixed for GCC 10.2 and 11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96077
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30529e2faa482bc749c65a490763dbc2ccaf63ac
commit r10-8470-g30529e2faa482bc749c65a490763dbc2ccaf63ac
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96077
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96077
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4fd124a23664c712f1bb1a7e91fa23fe83d72c0b
commit r11-2064-g4fd124a23664c712f1bb1a7e91fa23fe83d72c0b
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96077
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96077
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96077
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Doesn't even need to be in the ?: operator:
int
main ()
{
enum { E = (2 } e;
if (E != 2)
__builtin_abort ();
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96077
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96077
--- Comment #2 from Haoxin Tu ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> It's not ideal to provide a testcase that doesn't compile for an
> accepts-invalid bug. A testcase that actually compiles is a better
> demonstration that the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96077
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
10 matches
Mail list logo
